social performance organizations – cheapassignmenttutors.com

Points: 290

Assignment 1: Social Performance of Organizations

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Specify the nature, structure, and types of products or service of Apple, and two (2) key factors in the organization’s external environment that can affect its success. Provide explanation to support therationale.

Weight: 35%

Did not submit or incompletely specified the nature, structure, and types of products or service of Apple, and two (2) key factors in the organization’s external environment that can affect its success. Did not submit or incompletely provided explanation to support the rationale.

Insufficiently specified the nature, structure, and types of products or service of Apple, and two (2) key factors in the organization’s external environment that can affect its success. Insufficiently provided explanation to support the rationale.

Partially specified the nature, structure, and types of products or service of Apple, and two (2) key factors in the organization’s external environment that can affect its success. Partially provided explanation to support the rationale.

Satisfactorily specified the nature, structure, and types of products or service of Apple, and two (2) key factors in the organization’s external environment that can affect its success. Satisfactorily provided explanation to support the rationale.

Thoroughly specified the nature, structure, and types of products or service of Apple, and two (2) key factors in the organization’s external environment that can affect its success. Thoroughly provided explanation to support the rationale.

2. Suggest five (5) ways in which the primary stakeholders can influence the organization’s financial performance. Provide support for the response.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely suggested five (5) ways in which the primary stakeholders can influence the organization’s financial performance. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for the response.

Insufficiently incompletely suggested five (5) ways in which the primary stakeholders can influence the organization’s financial performance. Insufficiently provided support for the response.

Partially incompletely suggested five (5) ways in which the primary stakeholders can influence the organization’s financial performance. Partially provided support for the response.

Satisfactorily incompletely suggested five (5) ways in which the primary stakeholders can influence the organization’s financial performance. Satisfactorily provided support for the response.

Thoroughly incompletely suggested five (5) ways in which the primary stakeholders can influence the organization’s financial performance. Thoroughly provided support for the response.

3. Specify one (1) controversial corporate social responsibility concern associated with Apple.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely specified one (1) controversial corporate social responsibility concern associated with Apple.

Insufficiently specified one (1) controversial corporate social responsibility concern associated with Apple.

Partially specified one (1) controversial corporate social responsibility concern associated with Apple.

Satisfactorily specified one (1) controversial corporate social responsibility concern associated with Apple.

Thoroughly specified one (1) controversial corporate social responsibility concern associated with Apple.

4.Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting / Oral Communication. Clarity and Coherence of Writing / Presentation

Weight: 10%

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting / oral communication. Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, or formatting / oral communication.

Information is somewhat confusing with not enough reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting / oral communication.

Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting / oral communication. Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting / oral communication. Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

9.Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and  4 reference provided

Weight: 10%

Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.

In-text citations and references are given, but not in APA format. Does not meet the required number of references, and / or references are of poor quality.

In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style. Meets the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices

Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.